亚洲开发银行资助项目(17)

亚洲开发银行资助项目

gender to monitor gender impacts, how to provide opinions from gender experts during project implementation, if women are involved in monitoring and evaluation, and if the consultants appointed for the project have taken social gender issues into account, etc.

iii) Monitoring and evaluation of other social risks: For example, if any preferential policy for the low ability to pay of vulnerable groups is enacted, if effective measures are taken to control the risk of AIDS/HIVS dissemination, etc. at the implementation stage, and if the project is not implemented as scheduled, the cause shall be analyzed and a solution proposed. Of course, risks not expected by the SA staff may also arise at the implementation stage, and shall also be monitored at the implementation stage with inputs proposed.

b.

i) Social security monitoring and evaluation RP monitoring and evaluation: The key points of RP monitoring and evaluation

include the setup and capacity of the resettlement agency, if the land acquisition and house demolition procedure is lawful, resettlement progress, compensation rates for resettlement and payment of funds, how is the production and living resettlement plan for displaced persons implemented, the capacity of the resettlement agency, information disclosure and public participation, complaint and appeal mechanism for displaced persons, house reconstruction and income restoration survey of displaced persons, etc.

ii) EMDP monitoring and evaluation: Project monitoring shall pay attention to the

potential (positive or negative) impacts on the affected ethnic minorities; a feasibility EMDP shall be developed, the ethnic minorities mobilized to participate in the project, and

corresponding measures taken so that the ethnic minorities can benefit from the project in a culturally adapted manner.

D. SA at the project closing and reporting stage

Final reporting is an essential step in the lifecycle of any ADB financed project. The final report is usually prepared by the Project Manager of ADB and submitted to the ADB Board of Directors with the assistance of the employer or implementing agency of the project within a period after project completion. SA at this stage is usually done through a comparative method, such as comparison before and after the project. The key tasks are as follows:

i) Describing the social objectives of the project, their changes during implementation and the reasons for variation, judging if the evaluation objectives are feasible, and evaluating how the social objectives of the project are fulfilled and the terms of lending are performed;

ii) Evaluating the performance of the implementing agency, the social risks of the

project and how aversion measures are implemented;

iii) Analyzing the internal and external factors that affect the fulfillment of the project objectives, and determining the subjects of control of such factors;

iv) Making a social analysis of the sustainability of the project, mainly including the analysis of the project’s social impacts, how all stakeholders are involved in the project, comments of all stakeholders, and subsequent measures to be taken, etc..;

v) Describing and evaluating the operating plan of the project, including the

determination of the project’s social benefits on the basis of communication and consultation with all stakeholders, and the social monitoring indicators of the project during the operating period; and

vi) Discussing the success experience and lessons from failure of the project, and how to draw on such experience and lessons in future development, and what reference value such