一带一路战略研究外文文献翻译(5)

push the fault of the core countries. Extremism can not provides any workable solutions to real problems, but it reveals a fact that is a kind cannot be effectively solves the present within the framework of the existence of widespread resentment. Why a universal world order, but can be in fault state induced unable to dissolve the widespread resentment? The reason is that the United States generally dominated order, is a form of justice as its basic pursuit, because only the formal justice to make the basis of different faith community fined coexistence. But due to the exclusive monopoly for enforcement of the formal justice order -- includes it in a safe level of unilateral behavior, including its monopoly in economic terms such as the IMF's veto - this monopoly makes it can have some of the self-interest behavior mixed in, leading to formal justice contains a series of substantial justice. Under this is a kind of institutional contradictions, is one of the reasons caused widespread resentment. So, how to overcome this substance is not justice, makes the form of formal justice truly be justice, or, let the form justice and substance justice eventually form a closed question?

This need through the balance of international politics can be implemented. The question is what sense of balance? In the 19th century had a balance of power between European powers structure, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and other countries by constantly transformation alliance to look for the balance of power. For them, look for the balance of power structure is its ultimate purpose; there is nothing beyond can pursue from the balance of the order. But in the middle of the 20th century, especially after the cold war, we also see the possibility of another kind of balance of power, that is, on the basis of acknowledging the common order, form a kind of balance in its execution mechanism level. At this time of the balance of power is only instrumental, it exists for common order, and this is the basic difference with the balance of the 19th century. But the new balance of power must also be based on the strength of hedge. It is the same as the 19th century. Although the United States in the present monopoly for the enforcement of order in general, but we have already seen, on the one hand, due to its survival logic, the executive power in some Fang Li depth. On the other hand, more importantly, the executive power monopoly cannot avoid the