一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板

时间:2025-04-05

一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板

一些英文审稿意见的模板

最近在审一篇英文稿,第一次做这个工作,还有点不知如何表达。幸亏遇上我的处女审稿,我想不会枪毙它的,给他一个major revision后接收吧。呵呵

网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

1、目标和结果不清晰。

It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.

2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.

Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various

experiments should be provided.

3、对于研究设计的rationale:

Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.

4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨:

The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.

5、对hypothesis的清晰界定:

A hypothesis needs to be presented。

6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念:

What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?

7、对研究问题的定义:

Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,

write one section to define the problem

8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:

The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.

9、对claim,如A>B的证明,verification:

一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板

There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known

work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement

on previous work.

10、严谨度问题:

MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.

11、格式(重视程度):

In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but

not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for

Authors" which shows examples.

Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly

prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting

nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms"

button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.

12、语言问题(出现最多的问题):

有关语言的审稿人意见:

It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with

expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to

English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and

results of the study are clear to the reader.

The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper

translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper

review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling

mistakes or are not complete sentences.

As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are

problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction.

The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We

strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is

well-versed in English or whose native language is English.

Please have someone competent in the English language and the subject

matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it ?

the quality of English needs improving.

作为审稿人,本不应该把编辑部的这些信息公开(冒风险啊),

但我觉得有些意见值得广大投稿人注意,

就贴出来吧,当然,有关审稿人的名字,Email,文章题名信息等就都删除了,

以免造成不必要的麻烦!

希望朋友们多评价,其他有经验的审稿人能常来指点大家!

国人一篇文章投Mater.类知名国际杂志,

被塞尔维亚一审稿人打25分!

一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板

个人认为文章还是有一些创新的,

所以作为审稿人我就给了66分,(这个分正常应该足以发表),提了一些修改

意见,望作者修改后发表!

登录到编辑部网页一看,一个文章竟然有六个审稿人,

详细看了下打的分数,60分大修,60分小修,66分(我),25分拒,(好家伙,

竟然打25分,有魄力),拒但没有打分(另一国人审),最后一个没有回来!

两个拒的是需要我们反思和学习的!

(括号斜体内容为我注解)

Reviewer 4

Reviewer Recommendation Term: Reject

Overall Reviewer Manuscript Rating: 25

Comments to Editor: Reviewers are required to enter their name,

affiliation and e-mail address below. Please note this is for

administrative purposes and will not be seen by the author.

Title (Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs.): Prof.

Name: XXX

Affiliation: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx

Manuscript entitled "Synthesis XXX。。。。。。。。。。。" it has been synthesized

with a number of different methods and in a variety of forms. This

manuscript does not bring any new knowledge or data on materials property

and therefore only contribution may be in novel preparation method, still

t …… 此处隐藏:16467字,全部文档内容请下载后查看。喜欢就下载吧 ……

一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板.doc 将本文的Word文档下载到电脑

    精彩图片

    热门精选

    大家正在看

    × 游客快捷下载通道(下载后可以自由复制和排版)

    限时特价:7 元/份 原价:20元

    支付方式:

    开通VIP包月会员 特价:29元/月

    注:下载文档有可能“只有目录或者内容不全”等情况,请下载之前注意辨别,如果您已付费且无法下载或内容有问题,请联系我们协助你处理。
    微信:fanwen365 QQ:370150219