硕士毕业论文,探讨企业社会责任在中国酒店业的发展。

three-dimensions in CSP, which are CSR, social issues and corporate social responsiveness under one rubric. The purpose of the model was to help clarify and integrate various

definitional strands that have appeared in the literature (Lee, 2008). In this three-dimensional model, a first dimension includes economic responsibility, legal responsibility, ethic responsibility and voluntary responsibility. Second dimension is social problems

management. Third dimension is the strategy, method and Philosophy of manages resolving CSR and Social problems (Shen and Chen, 2007).

The most important contribution of the model is that the three-dimensional model does not treat the economic and social goals of corporation as incompatible trade-offs. Rather, both corporate objectives are integrated into the framework of total social responsibility of business which includes economic, legal, ethical and discretionary categories (Lee, 2008). The shortcoming of the CSP missed an important aspect, which was implementation. There was a big problem in measuring and testing the CSP (Wood and Jones, 1995). Besides, it is difficult to compare the corporate social performance without objective and behavioural, the measure should be founded in order to measure the performance (Lee, 2008).

2.4. The 1990s

The concept of CSR and stakeholder theory used to be independent studies field developed separately. CSR was to discuss corporations to undertake social responsibility. The

stakeholder theory researched the relationship between corporations and stakeholders. Since 1990s, the stakeholder theory was considered the relevant framework of theory to assess CSR, the two theories between CSR and stakeholder theory commenced to the trend of

comprehensive combination (Shen and Chen, 2007). The stakeholder model of CSR was developed mainly by management scholars who were frustrated by the lack of practicality of the previous theoretical models.